Before us, numerous of scholars have worked on the problem of gender diversity in OSS, and broadly, STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering, and Math) fields. Along with our analysis, we compiled a list of prior works that reported gender representation across the years. We grouped prior studies by their data collection methods, such as survey or data mining, and their samples, such as the entire OSS population or sub-population of specific ecosystems or projects.
Title | Ecosystems | Reference |
---|---|---|
Gender differences and bias in open source: pull request acceptance of women versus men | Objective-C, Matlab, Ruby, Python, C++, PHP | Terrell, J., Kofink, A., Middleton, J., Rainear, C., Murphy-Hill, E., Parnin, C., & Stallings, J. (2017). Gender differences and bias in open source: Pull request acceptance of women versus men. PeerJ Computer Science, 3, e111. |
Gendered behavior as a disadvantage in open source software development | JavaScript, HTML, CSS, Ruby, PHP, Python, Jupyter Notebook, R, C++, CSS | Vedres, B., & Vasarhelyi, O. (2019). Gendered behavior as a disadvantage in open source software development. EPJ Data Science, 8(1), 25. |
Title | Year | Data Source | Sample Size | Women Percentage | Reference |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Who Is Doing It | 2001 | Online Survey | 5,478 | 0% | Robles, G., Scheider, H., Tretkowski, I., & Weber, N. (2001). Who is doing it. A research on Libre Software developers. |
Free/libre and open source software: Survey and study | 2002 | Online Survey | 2,748 | 1.10% | Ghosh, R. A., Glott, R., Krieger, B., & Robles, G. (2002). Free/libre and open source software: Survey and study. |
Why hackers do what they do: Understanding motivation and effort in free/open source software projects | 2001-2002 | 684 | 2.50% | Lakhani, K. R., & Wolf, R. G. (2003). Why hackers do what they do: Understanding motivation and effort in free/open source software projects. Open Source Software Projects (September 2003). | |
Working for free? Motivations for participating in open-source projects | 2002 | 79 | 5.00% | Alexander Hars, S. O. (2002). Working for free? Motivations for participating in open-source projects. International journal of electronic commerce, 6(3), 25-39. | |
FLOSS-US the free/libre/open source software survey for 2003 | 2003 | Online Survey | 1,588 | 1.60% | David, P. A., Waterman, A., & Arora, S. (2003). FLOSS-US the free/libre/open source software survey for 2003. Stanford Institute for Economic Policy Research, Stanford University, Stanford, CA (http://www. stanford. edu/group/floss-us/report/FLOSS-US-Report. pdf). |
Motivations in open source software communities: The mediating role of effort intensity and goal commitment | 2010 | Online Survey | 230 | 4.00% | Ke, W., & Zhang, P. (2009). Motivations in open source software communities: The mediating role of effort intensity and goal commitment. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 13(4), 39-66. |
Women in free/libre/open source software: The situation in the 2010s | 2013 | Online Survey | 2,183 | 10.35% | Robles, G., Reina, L. A., González-Barahona, J. M., & Domínguez, S. D. (2016, May). Women in free/libre/open source software: The situation in the 2010s. In IFIP International Conference on Open Source Systems (pp. 163-173). Springer, Cham. |
Gender and tenure diversity in github teams | 2015 | Online Survey | 816 | 24.00% | Vasilescu, B., Posnett, D., Ray, B., van den Brand, M. G., Serebrenik, A., Devanbu, P., & Filkov, V. (2015, April). Gender and tenure diversity in GitHub teams. In Proceedings of the 33rd annual ACM conference on human factors in computing systems (pp. 3789-3798). |
GitHub Open Source Survey | 2017 | Online Survey | 6,000 | 5.00% | GitHub Survey |
StackOverflow Developer Survey Results | 2017 | Online Survey | 64,000 | 7.60% | StackOverflow Survey |
FLOSS participants' perceptions about gender and inclusiveness: a survey | 2019 | Online Survey | 119 | 10.90% | Lee, A., & Carver, J. C. (2019, May). FLOSS participants' perceptions about gender and inclusiveness: a survey. In Proceedings of the 41st International Conference on Software Engineering (ICSE) (pp. 677-687). IEEE. |
The shifting sands of motivation: Revisiting what drives contributors in open source | 2021 | Online Survey | 242 | 7.60% | Gerosa, M., Wiese, I., Trinkenreich, B., Link, G., Robles, G., Treude, C., ... & Sarma, A. (2021, May). The shifting sands of motivation: Revisiting what drives contributors in open source. In Proceedings of the 43rd International Conference on Software Engineering (ICSE) (pp. 1046-1058). IEEE. |
Title | Year | Data Source | Gender Inferece | Sample Size | Women Percentage | Reference |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Gender differences in early free and open source software joining process | 2012 | email subscribers | US Census | 1,931 | 8.27% | Kuechler, V., Gilbertson, C., & Jensen, C. (2012, September). Gender differences in early free and open source software joining process. In IFIP International Conference on Open Source Systems (pp. 78-93). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. |
Gender, representation and online participation: A quantitative study of stackoverflow | 2012 | StackOverflow | genderComputer | 2,588 | 11.24% | Vasilescu, B., Capiluppi, A., & Serebrenik, A. (2012, December). Gender, representation and online participation: A quantitative study of stackoverflow. In 2012 International Conference on Social Informatics (pp. 332-338). IEEE. |
Contributions of the under-appreciated: Gender bias in an open-source ecology | 2015 | GitHub | genderComputer | 1,049,345 | 8.71% | Kofink, A. (2015, October). Contributions of the under-appreciated: Gender bias in an open-source ecology. In Companion Proceedings of the 2015 ACM SIGPLAN International Conference on Systems, Programming, Languages and Applications: Software for Humanity (pp. 83-84). |
A data set for social diversity studies of GitHub teams | 2015 | GitHub | genderComputer | 837,392 | 9.00% | Vasilescu, B., Serebrenik, A., & Filkov, V. (2015, May). A data set for social diversity studies of GitHub teams. In 2015 IEEE/ACM 12th working conference on mining software repositories (pp. 514-517). IEEE. |
Gender differences and bias in open source: Pull request acceptance of women versus men | 2017 | GitHub | modified genderComputer + Google+ | 328,988 | 6.36% | Terrell, J., Kofink, A., Middleton, J., Rainear, C., Murphy-Hill, E., Parnin, C., & Stallings, J. (2017). Gender differences and bias in open source: Pull request acceptance of women versus men. PeerJ Computer Science, 3, e111. |
Going farther together: The impact of social capital on sustained participation in open source | 2019 | GitHub | Namsor | 300,000 | 9.70% | Qiu, H. S., Nolte, A., Brown, A., Serebrenik, A., & Vasilescu, B. (2019, May). Going farther together: The impact of social capital on sustained participation in open source. In Proceedings of 2019 ieee/acm 41st international conference on software engineering (ICSE) (pp. 688-699). IEEE. |
Diversity and inclusion in open source software (OSS) projects: Where do we stand? | 2019 | Gerrit | modified genderComputer + Google+ + LinkedIn + Facebook + Google Search | 4,543 | 8.80% | Bosu, A., & Sultana, K. Z. (2019, September). Diversity and inclusion in open source software (OSS) projects: Where do we stand?. In 2019 ACM/IEEE International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering and Measurement (ESEM) (pp. 1-11). IEEE. |
Gender diversity in the OpenStack community: A new report | 2013-2017 | OpenStack Summit in Barcelona and Boston | genderize.io | - | 9.80% | Izquierdo, D., Huesman, N., Serebrenik, A., & Robles, G. (2018). Openstack gender diversity report. IEEE Software, 36(1), 28-33. |
Gender diversity in the OpenStack community: A new report | 2017 | Online Survey | genderize.io | - | 10.40% | Izquierdo, D., Huesman, N., Serebrenik, A., & Robles, G. (2018). Openstack gender diversity report. IEEE Software, 36(1), 28-33. |
Work practices and perceptions from women core developers in OSS communities | 2020 | GitHub | genderComputer + Namsor | 242,662 | 5.35% | Canedo, E. D., Bonifácio, R., Okimoto, M. V., Serebrenik, A., Pinto, G., & Monteiro, E. (2020, October). Work practices and perceptions from women core developers in oss communities. In Proceedings of the 14th ACM/IEEE International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering and Measurement (ESEM) (pp. 1-11). |
Work practices and perceptions from women core developers in OSS communities | 2020 | GitHub | genderComputer + Namsor | 1,954 core | 2.30% | Canedo, E. D., Bonifácio, R., Okimoto, M. V., Serebrenik, A., Pinto, G., & Monteiro, E. (2020, October). Work practices and perceptions from women core developers in oss communities. In Proceedings of the 14th ACM/IEEE International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering and Measurement (ESEM) (pp. 1-11). |
Gender Typicality of Behavior Predicts Success on Creative Platforms | 2021 | GitHub | genderComputer + Simple Gender | 1,634,373 | 5.49% | Vasarhelyi, O., & Vedres, B. (2021). Gender Typicality of Behavior Predicts Success on Creative Platforms. arXiv preprint arXiv:2103.01093. |
Including everyone, everywhere: Understanding opportunities and challenges of geographic gender-inclusion in oss | 2021 | GitHub | genderize.io | 65,132 | 10.00% | Prana, G. A. A., Ford, D., Rastogi, A., Lo, D., Purandare, R., & Nagappan, N. (2021). Including everyone, everywhere: Understanding opportunities and challenges of geographic gender-inclusion in oss. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering. |
Worldwide Gender Differences in Public Code Contributions: and how they have been affected by the COVID-19 pandemic | 2022 | Software Heritage | GENDER GUESSER | 21.4M | 10.00% | Rossi, D., & Zacchiroli, S. (2022). Worldwide Gender Differences in Public Code Contributions. arXiv preprint arXiv:2202.07278. |
Worldwide Gender Differences in Public Code Contributions | 2022 | Software Heritage | GENDER GUESSER | 21.4M | 10.00% | Rossi, D., & Zacchiroli, S. (2022). Worldwide Gender Differences in Public Code Contributions. In Proceedings of 2022 International Conference on Software Engineering (ICSE). IEEE. |
Title | Ecosystem | Year | Data Source | Gender Inferece | Sample Size | Women Percentage | Reference |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Gender, representation and online participation: A quantitative study | Drupal | 2014 | mailing list | genderComputer | 3,342 | 9.81% | Vasilescu, B., Capiluppi, A., & Serebrenik, A. (2014). Gender, representation and online participation: A quantitative study. Interacting with Computers, 26(5), 488-511. |
Gender, representation and online participation: A quantitative study | Wordpress | 2014 | mailing list | genderComputer | 3,611 | 7.81% | Vasilescu, B., Capiluppi, A., & Serebrenik, A. (2014). Gender, representation and online participation: A quantitative study. Interacting with Computers, 26(5), 488-511. |
ASF Committer Diversity Survey. 2016 | Apache | 2016 | Online survey | - | 765 | 5.20% | Sharan, F. (2020). ASF Committer Diversity Survey. 2016. |
Gender-diversity Analysis of the Linux Kernel Technical Contributions | Linux | 2005-2016 | GitHub | genderize.io | 14,905 | 8% | Linux Report |
Preliminary report on the influence of capital in an ethical-modular project: Quantitative data from the 2016 Debian survey | Debian | 2016 | Online survey | - | 1,479 | 2% | Raissi, M., de Blanc, M., & Zacchiroli, S. (2017). Preliminary report on the influence of capital in an ethical-modular project: Quantitative data from the 2016 Debian survey. Journal of Peer Production, (10), 1-25. |
Where Are Females in OSS Projects? Socio Technical Interactions | Angular.js | 2019 | GitHub | Namsor | 1,601 | 3.40% | Asri, I. E., & Kerzazi, N. (2019, September). Where Are Females in OSS Projects? Socio Technical Interactions. In Working Conference on Virtual Enterprises (pp. 308-319). Springer, Cham. |
Where Are Females in OSS Projects? Socio Technical Interactions | Moby | 2019 | GitHub | Namsor | 1,824 | 3.50% | Asri, I. E., & Kerzazi, N. (2019, September). Where Are Females in OSS Projects? Socio Technical Interactions. In Working Conference on Virtual Enterprises (pp. 308-319). Springer, Cham. |
Where Are Females in OSS Projects? Socio Technical Interactions | Rails | 2019 | GitHub | Namsor | 3,723 | 4.20% | Asri, I. E., & Kerzazi, N. (2019, September). Where Are Females in OSS Projects? Socio Technical Interactions. In Working Conference on Virtual Enterprises (pp. 308-319). Springer, Cham. |
Where Are Females in OSS Projects? Socio Technical Interactions | Django | 2019 | GitHub | Namsor | 1,672 | 5.30% | Asri, I. E., & Kerzazi, N. (2019, September). Where Are Females in OSS Projects? Socio Technical Interactions. In Working Conference on Virtual Enterprises (pp. 308-319). Springer, Cham. |
Where Are Females in OSS Projects? Socio Technical Interactions | Elasticsearch | 2019 | GitHub | Namsor | 1,127 | 4.20% | Asri, I. E., & Kerzazi, N. (2019, September). Where Are Females in OSS Projects? Socio Technical Interactions. In Working Conference on Virtual Enterprises (pp. 308-319). Springer, Cham. |
Where Are Females in OSS Projects? Socio Technical Interactions | TensorFlow | 2019 | GitHub | Namsor | 1,735 | 5.80% | Asri, I. E., & Kerzazi, N. (2019, September). Where Are Females in OSS Projects? Socio Technical Interactions. In Working Conference on Virtual Enterprises (pp. 308-319). Springer, Cham. |
Diversity and inclusion in open source software (OSS) projects: Where do we stand? | Android | 2019 | Gerrit | genderComputer | 258 core | 3.87% | Bosu, A., & Sultana, K. Z. (2019, September). Diversity and inclusion in open source software (OSS) projects: Where do we stand?. In 2019 ACM/IEEE International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering and Measurement (ESEM) (pp. 1-11). IEEE. |
Diversity and inclusion in open source software (OSS) projects: Where do we stand? | Chromium OS | 2019 | Gerrit | genderComputer | 151 core | 3.97% | Bosu, A., & Sultana, K. Z. (2019, September). Diversity and inclusion in open source software (OSS) projects: Where do we stand?. In 2019 ACM/IEEE International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering and Measurement (ESEM) (pp. 1-11). IEEE. |
Diversity and inclusion in open source software (OSS) projects: Where do we stand? | Couchbase | 2019 | Gerrit | genderComputer | 24 core | 4.17% | Bosu, A., & Sultana, K. Z. (2019, September). Diversity and inclusion in open source software (OSS) projects: Where do we stand?. In 2019 ACM/IEEE International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering and Measurement (ESEM) (pp. 1-11). IEEE. |
Diversity and inclusion in open source software (OSS) projects: Where do we stand? | Go | 2019 | Gerrit | genderComputer | 90 core | 7.77% | Bosu, A., & Sultana, K. Z. (2019, September). Diversity and inclusion in open source software (OSS) projects: Where do we stand?. In 2019 ACM/IEEE International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering and Measurement (ESEM) (pp. 1-11). IEEE. |
Diversity and inclusion in open source software (OSS) projects: Where do we stand? | LibreOffice | 2019 | Gerrit | genderComputer | 68 core | 1.47% | Bosu, A., & Sultana, K. Z. (2019, September). Diversity and inclusion in open source software (OSS) projects: Where do we stand?. In 2019 ACM/IEEE International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering and Measurement (ESEM) (pp. 1-11). IEEE. |
Diversity and inclusion in open source software (OSS) projects: Where do we stand? | OmapZoom | 2019 | Gerrit | genderComputer | 64 core | 10% | Bosu, A., & Sultana, K. Z. (2019, September). Diversity and inclusion in open source software (OSS) projects: Where do we stand?. In 2019 ACM/IEEE International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering and Measurement (ESEM) (pp. 1-11). IEEE. |
Diversity and inclusion in open source software (OSS) projects: Where do we stand? | oVirt | 2019 | Gerrit | genderComputer | 34 core | 2.94% | Bosu, A., & Sultana, K. Z. (2019, September). Diversity and inclusion in open source software (OSS) projects: Where do we stand?. In 2019 ACM/IEEE International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering and Measurement (ESEM) (pp. 1-11). IEEE. |
Diversity and inclusion in open source software (OSS) projects: Where do we stand? | Qt | 2019 | Gerrit | genderComputer | 159 core | 3.12% | Bosu, A., & Sultana, K. Z. (2019, September). Diversity and inclusion in open source software (OSS) projects: Where do we stand?. In 2019 ACM/IEEE International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering and Measurement (ESEM) (pp. 1-11). IEEE. |
Diversity and inclusion in open source software (OSS) projects: Where do we stand? | Typo3 | 2019 | Gerrit | genderComputer | 73 core | 4.10% | Bosu, A., & Sultana, K. Z. (2019, September). Diversity and inclusion in open source software (OSS) projects: Where do we stand?. In 2019 ACM/IEEE International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering and Measurement (ESEM) (pp. 1-11). IEEE. |
Diversity and inclusion in open source software (OSS) projects: Where do we stand? | Whamcloud | 2019 | Gerrit | genderComputer | 19 core | 0% | Bosu, A., & Sultana, K. Z. (2019, September). Diversity and inclusion in open source software (OSS) projects: Where do we stand?. In 2019 ACM/IEEE International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering and Measurement (ESEM) (pp. 1-11). IEEE. |
The Linux Foundation Report on Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion in Open Source | Linux | 2021 | Online survey | - | 2,350 | 14% | Linux Report |
Diversity and inclusion in open source software (OSS) projects: Where do we stand? | 2019 | Gerrit | modified genderComputer + Google+ + LinkedIn + Facebook + Google Search | 4,543 | 8.80% | Bosu, A., & Sultana, K. Z. (2019, September). Diversity and inclusion in open source software (OSS) projects: Where do we stand?. In 2019 ACM/IEEE International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering and Measurement (ESEM) (pp. 1-11). IEEE. | |
Gender diversity in the OpenStack community: A new report | 2013-2017 | OpenStack Summit in Barcelona and Boston | genderize.io | - | 9.80% | Izquierdo, D., Huesman, N., Serebrenik, A., & Robles, G. (2018). Openstack gender diversity report. IEEE Software, 36(1), 28-33. | |
Gender diversity in the OpenStack community: A new report | 2017 | Online Survey | genderize.io | - | 10.40% | Izquierdo, D., Huesman, N., Serebrenik, A., & Robles, G. (2018). Openstack gender diversity report. IEEE Software, 36(1), 28-33. | |
Work practices and perceptions from women core developers in OSS communities | 2020 | GitHub | genderComputer + Namsor | 242,662 | 5.35% | Canedo, E. D., Bonifácio, R., Okimoto, M. V., Serebrenik, A., Pinto, G., & Monteiro, E. (2020, October). Work practices and perceptions from women core developers in oss communities. In Proceedings of the 14th ACM/IEEE International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering and Measurement (ESEM) (pp. 1-11). | |
Work practices and perceptions from women core developers in OSS communities | 2020 | GitHub | genderComputer + Namsor | 1,954 core | 2.30% | Canedo, E. D., Bonifácio, R., Okimoto, M. V., Serebrenik, A., Pinto, G., & Monteiro, E. (2020, October). Work practices and perceptions from women core developers in oss communities. In Proceedings of the 14th ACM/IEEE International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering and Measurement (ESEM) (pp. 1-11). | |
Gender Typicality of Behavior Predicts Success on Creative Platforms | 2021 | GitHub | genderComputer + Simple Gender | 1,634,373 | 5.49% | Vasarhelyi, O., & Vedres, B. (2021). Gender Typicality of Behavior Predicts Success on Creative Platforms. arXiv preprint arXiv:2103.01093. | |
Including everyone, everywhere: Understanding opportunities and challenges of geographic gender-inclusion in oss | 2021 | GitHub | genderize.io | 65,132 | 10.00% | Prana, G. A. A., Ford, D., Rastogi, A., Lo, D., Purandare, R., & Nagappan, N. (2021). Including everyone, everywhere: Understanding opportunities and challenges of geographic gender-inclusion in oss. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering. | |
Worldwide Gender Differences in Public Code Contributions: and how they have been affected by the COVID-19 pandemic | 2022 | Software Heritage | GENDER GUESSER | 21.4M | 10.00% | Rossi, D., & Zacchiroli, S. (2022). Worldwide Gender Differences in Public Code Contributions. arXiv preprint arXiv:2202.07278. |